Hock 5 Hudson 0 and they say wigan are favoured.

It wasn't the same offence.

Did he not put his hands on the ref? After all when hock did it you had people saying he should be banned for life! Granted they wernt at the game but still!

Also carvel only got a warning for a trip! Granted we all wanted mathers to get as many games as possible so he was unavailiable, but its stuff like this that annoys people!

They were totally different.


As I've said on another thread, Ganson was walking towards Hudson and Hudson just put his hands on his shoulders for a split second as though he was stopping him so that he could have an explination.

He shouldn't have done it but a ticking off was sufficient.

Then why put it on report?

Im not disagreeing with you just playing devils advocate.

And players get to handle the ref for an explanation and when Hock touched the ref's arm what was he doing? Trying to break it or get the ref's attention? As Ganson was walking towards Hudson there was no reason for contact at all.

Surely there's a difference between placing your hand on the refs shoulder to ask a question and grabbing his arm and swearing at him?

hock deserved everything he got,hudson was asking a polite friendly question to ganson,anything more he would have got sent straight off....FACT

It's also worth mentioning that as captain, Hudson can question the referee.

thats so right as captin hudson can do what he likes lol,different position but better player than hock too hahaha

Quote PAULAW.1="PAULAW.1"thats so right as captin hudson can do what he likes lol,different position but better player than hock too hahaha'" You do know that there's a forum for your team as well, don't you? viewforum.php?f=16

Quote PAULAW.1="PAULAW.1"thats so right as captin hudson can do what he likes lol,different position but better player than hock too hahaha'" You do know that there's a forum for your team as well, don't you? viewforum.php?f=16