Quote moving on...="moving on..."So... What is it exactly you want us to do about it?'"
Dual Reg is a farce.
Kevin Penny's try against Keighley nearly lead to North Wales beating Keighley (Keighley won with an on-the-hooter drop goal). That would have been unfair. Even if you support dual reg, Kevin Penny doesn't meet the criteria ...
[size=50" The purpose of this Rule is to provide an enhanced Player development pathway for young Players who are not thought to be ready to make the step up to first team for their Club on a permanent basis but for whom first team match experience in a lower league is likely to be beneficial for their development. It is intended to provide additional flexibility for Clubs to make arrangements that suit the Player’s development needs whilst protecting both the playing squad requirements of the Clubs concerned and the integrity of both competitions. [/size
Keighley Cougars operate a reserve side and all the young players have been developed by the club and live within a 10 mile radius of Keighley. Last Thursday they beat Great Britain (BARLA) Amateur team convincingly. Keighley's central funding for the whole of 2015 is less than the salary paid to one Warrington first team player.
What do we want you to do about it?
When you vote in favour of the Marquee player salary cap exemption arrange, in addition, a vote in favour of requiring Super League clubs to run an "A" or under 21 with 5 over age players allowed or whatever reserve team from 2016 onwards and scrap dual registration.
It's a blight on the game of rugby league.
